Optimal Voting Rules
Author(s) -
Alex Gershkov,
Benny Moldovanu,
Xianwen Shi
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the review of economic studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 15.641
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1467-937X
pISSN - 0034-6527
DOI - 10.1093/restud/rdw044
Subject(s) - voting , outcome (game theory) , incentive , ex ante , economics , class (philosophy) , microeconomics , replicate , welfare , incentive compatibility , mathematical economics , social choice theory , legislature , computer science , majority rule , econometrics , mathematics , artificial intelligence , law , statistics , political science , politics , market economy , macroeconomics
We derive the incentive compatible and ex-ante welfare maximizing (i.e., utilitarian) mechanism for settings with an arbitrary number of agents and alternatives where the privately informed agents have single-crossing and single-peaked preferences. The optimal outcome can be implemented by modifying a sequential voting scheme, due to Bowen (1943), and used in many legislatures and committees. The modiÖcation uses a áexible majority threshold for each of several alternatives, and allows us to replicate, via a single sequential procedure, the entire class of anonymous, unanimous and dominant strategy incentive compatible mechanisms. Our analysis relies on the elegant characterization of this class of mechanisms for single-peaked preferences by Moulin (1980) and, subsequently, for single-crossing preferences by Saporiti (2009)
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom