z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
An Evaluation of Alternative Multiple Testing Methods for Finance Applications
Author(s) -
Campbell R. Harvey,
Yan Liu,
Alessio Saretto
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the review of asset pricing studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.356
H-Index - 19
eISSN - 2045-9939
pISSN - 2045-9920
DOI - 10.1093/rapstu/raaa003
Subject(s) - luck , computer science , identification (biology) , inference , multiple comparisons problem , statistic , statistical hypothesis testing , variety (cybernetics) , econometrics , machine learning , artificial intelligence , statistics , economics , mathematics , philosophy , botany , theology , biology
In almost every area of empirical finance, researchers confront multiple tests. One high-profile example is the identification of outperforming investment managers, many of whom beat their benchmarks purely by luck. Multiple testing methods are designed to control for luck. Factor selection is another glaring case in which multiple tests are performed, but numerous other applications do not receive as much attention. One important example is a simple regression model testing five variables. In this case, because five variables are tried, a t-statistic of 2.0 is not enough to establish significance. Our paper provides a guide to various multiple testing methods and details a number of applications. We provide simulation evidence on the relative performance of different methods across a variety of testing environments. The goal of our paper is to provide a menu that researchers can choose from to improve inference in financial economics. (JEL G0, G1, G3, G5, M4, C1)

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom