Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: advancing TREND and CONSORT
Author(s) -
Rebecca Armstrong,
Elizabeth Waters,
Laurence Moore,
Elisha Riggs,
Luis Gabriel Cuervo,
Pisake Lumbiga,
Penelope Hawe
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.916
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1741-3850
pISSN - 1741-3842
DOI - 10.1093/pubmed/fdm082
Subject(s) - public health , psychological intervention , context (archaeology) , sustainability , medicine , population health , population , environmental health , intervention (counseling) , health policy , nursing , paleontology , ecology , biology
Evidence-based public health decision-making depends on high quality and transparent accounts of what interventions are effective, for whom, how and at what cost. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized and non-randomized study designs through the CONSORT and TREND statements has had a marked impact on the quality of study designs. However, public health users of systematic reviews have been concerned with the paucity of synthesized information on context, development and rationale, implementation processes and sustainability factors.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom