z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Governing in a Polarized Era: Federalism and the Response of U.S. State and Federal Governments to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Author(s) -
Thomas A. Birkland,
Kristin Taylor,
Deserai A. Crow,
Rob A. DeLeo
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
publius the journal of federalism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.926
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1747-7107
pISSN - 0048-5950
DOI - 10.1093/publius/pjab024
Subject(s) - federalism , pandemic , covid-19 , state (computer science) , political science , politics , public health , political economy , public administration , sociology , law , medicine , nursing , disease , pathology , algorithm , computer science , infectious disease (medical specialty)
How does the state of American federalism explain responses to COVID-19? State-by-state variations to the COVID-19 pandemic illustrate the political dynamics of “kaleidoscopic federalism,” under which there is no single prevailing principle of federalism. In the COVID-19 pandemic, features of kaleidoscopic federalism combined with shortcomings in the public health system under the Trump administration, leading to fragmented responses to the pandemic among the states. Federalism alone does not explain the shortcomings of the United States’ response to the pandemic. Rather, the fragmented response was driven by state partisanship, which shaped state public health interventions and resulted in differences in public health outcomes. This has sobering implications for American federalism because state-level partisan differences yield different and unequal responses to the pandemic.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom