Explaining the Policy Process Underpinning Public Sector Reform: The Role of Ideas, Institutions, and Timing
Author(s) -
Nicolette van Gestel,
JeanLouis Denis,
Ewan Ferlı́e,
Aoife M. McDermott
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
perspectives on public management and governance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2398-4929
pISSN - 2398-4910
DOI - 10.1093/ppmgov/gvx020
Subject(s) - underpinning , interdependence , process (computing) , public sector , public policy , public administration , plan (archaeology) , economics , public economics , political science , public relations , sociology , economic growth , engineering , social science , economy , computer science , civil engineering , archaeology , history , operating system
This article provides theoretical elaboration of the policy process underpinning the emergence of public sector reform. It reviews the three predominant models for understanding, namely the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), Institutional Theory Approaches (ITA), and the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF). Rather than treating these frameworks as competing, the article identifies their complementary and interdependent contributions to explaining the policy process underpinning public sector reform, specifically the central driving role of ideas, institutions and timing. The article provides a case for combining the three frameworks - and their identified drivers - to inform an integrated and elaborated model of public sector reform processes. The utility of the model is evidenced via an ex-post analysis of the ten-year ‘NHS Plan’, which operated in the UK from 2000 to 2010. Discussion considers implications for key theoretical issues in researching and explaining the policy process underpinning public sector reform.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom