English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Fact: Radiofrequency neurotomy can be safely performed in these patients; however, close collaboration with a cardiologist or electrophysiologist is recommended before initiating the RFN procedure. Radiofrequency neurotomy is used in pain medicine for the treatment of painful conditions including facet joint pain. Patients with facet (z-joint) pain may have unrelated comorbidities that require implanted permanent pacemaker (PPM) or implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD). Both of these devices rely on the detection of electrical cardiac activity, rhythm, and rate to function properly. There are reports of RFN for various uses causing PPM/ICD dysfunction. There are no known reports of RFN procedures for spine pain causing ICD or PPM dysfunction that led to serious injury or death. For reports of PPM device malfunction, some data can be extrapolated from data on RFN for cardiac arrhythmias. Most of the available data have focused on PPM rather than ICD dysfunction. RFN can theoretically disrupt the function of either device. A 1995 study looked at PPM activity in 25 patients with 13 different devices, most with unipolar electrodes, undergoing RFN for tachyarrythmia. Sensing failures were observed in eight (32.0%) patients, and pacing failures in four (16.0%) patients. No pacemaker damage was seen. An animal study looked at the effects of RFN on pacemaker function. The authors found that there are several parameters that reduce the interference with PPM function by monopolar instruments. These parameters included lowering the generator power setting and locating the dispersive electrode so the current vector does not traverse the pacemaker generator or leads. The theoretical risks of RFN for the lumbar and cervical spine are less than for cardiac and intrathoracic procedures, where the RFN probes are in much closer proximity to device leads. There is some evidence that bipolar RFN may be safer than monopolar RFN. There are no data available on whether other RFN technologies such as pulsed and cooled RFN have a comparable risk profile. Theoretically the fact that these procedures are performed far away from PPM/ICD leads again suggests that they, like conventional RFN, likely carry far less risk than cardiac and intrathoracic RFN. Professional organizations, device manufacturers, and other experts have recommended precautions to minimize any possible risk of RFN interfering with PPM/ICD function. The American Society of Anesthesiologists has advised that for both ICD and PPM, the grounding electrode should be placed >15 cm away from pacing leads and has recommended consideration of including a device representative or electrophysiologist for consideration of placing a magnet over the device or altering the mode. Postprocedure monitoring of the pacemaker is also advised. Device manufacturers have also weighed in on the topic. For PPM, device manufacturers recommend either placing a magnet over the device or programming the PPM to an asynchronous mode. For ICD, device manufacturers recommend deactivating tachy therapy before the RFN procedure. This can be accomplished by reprogramming or putting a magnet over the device.

Radiofrequency Neurotomy for Facet Joint Pain in Patients with Permanent Pacemakers and Defibrillators