Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) with Anatomically Guided (3D) Neural Targeting Shows Superior Chronic Axial Low Back Pain Relief Compared to Traditional SCS—LUMINA Study
Author(s) -
Elias Veizi,
Salim M. Hayek,
James North,
Timothy B. Chafin,
Thomas Yearwood,
Louis J. Raso,
Robert Frey,
Kevin D. Cairns,
Anthony Berg,
John K. Brendel,
Nameer Haider,
Matthew McCarty,
Henry Vucetic,
Alden Sherman,
LungChi Chen,
Nitzan Mekel-Bobrov
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
pain medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.893
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1526-4637
pISSN - 1526-2375
DOI - 10.1093/pm/pnw286
Subject(s) - medicine , cohort , chronic pain , spinal cord , implant , cohort study , retrospective cohort study , spinal cord stimulator , observational study , anesthesia , spinal cord stimulation , surgery , physical therapy , stimulation , psychiatry
The aim of this study was to determine whether spinal cord stimulation (SCS) using 3D neural targeting provided sustained overall and low back pain relief in a broad routine clinical practice population.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom