Twelve-Month Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Intradiscal Biacuplasty to Conventional Medical Management for Discogenic Lumbar Back Pain | Zendy

Mehul Desai | Zendy; Leonardo Kapural | Zendy; Jeffrey D. Petersohn | Zendy; Ricardo Vallejo | Zendy; Robert Menzies | Zendy; Michael Creamer | Zendy; Michael Gofeld | Zendy

Open Access

Twelve-Month Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Intradiscal Biacuplasty to Conventional Medical Management for Discogenic Lumbar Back Pain

Author(s) -

Mehul Desai,

Leonardo Kapural,

Jeffrey D. Petersohn,

Ricardo Vallejo,

Robert Menzies,

Michael Creamer,

Michael Gofeld

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

pain medicine

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.893

H-Index - 97

eISSN - 1526-4637

pISSN - 1526-2375

DOI - 10.1093/pm/pnw184

Subject(s) - medicine , randomized controlled trial , low back pain , lumbar , physical therapy , clinical endpoint , surgery , alternative medicine , pathology

This report conveys 12-month outcomes of subjects treated with intradiscal biacuplasty (IDB) and conservative medical management (CMM) for chronic low back pain of discogenic origin, and results for subjects who elected to receive IDB + CMM 6 months after CMM-alone.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research