Acclimation, adaptation, traits and trade-offs in plankton functional type models: reconciling terminology for biology and modelling
Author(s) -
Kevin J. Flynn,
Michael St. John,
John A. Raven,
D. O. F. Skibinski,
J. Icarus Allen,
Aditee Mitra,
Eileen E. Hofmann
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of plankton research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.87
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1464-3774
pISSN - 0142-7873
DOI - 10.1093/plankt/fbv036
Subject(s) - adaptation (eye) , terminology , biology , ecology , trait , organism , biogeochemistry , plankton , systems biology , computer science , computational biology , neuroscience , paleontology , philosophy , linguistics , programming language
We propose definitions in terminology to enhance ongoing collaborations between biologists and modellers on plankton ecology. Organism “functional type” should refer to commonality in ecology not biogeochemistry; the latter is largely an emergent property of the former, while alignment with ecology is also consistent with usage in terrestrial science. Adaptation should be confined, as in genetics, to consideration of species inter-generational change; most so-called “adaptive” plankton models are thus acclimative, modifying vital rates in response to stimuli. Trait trade-off approaches should ideally only be considered for describing intra-generational interactions; in applications between generations, and certainly between unrelated species, such concepts should be avoided. We suggest that systems biology approaches, through to complex adaptive/acclimative systems modelling, with explicit modelling of feedback processes (which we suggest should define “mechanistic” models), would provide realistic and flexible bases upon which to develop descriptions of functional type models.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom