Predator–prey interactions: is ‘ecological stoichiometry’ sufficient when good food goes bad?
Author(s) -
Aditee Mitra,
Kevin J. Flynn
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of plankton research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.87
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1464-3774
pISSN - 0142-7873
DOI - 10.1093/plankt/fbi022
Subject(s) - predation , trophic level , predator , ecological stoichiometry , ecology , biology , functional response , assimilation (phonology) , food chain , food quality , nutrient , food science , linguistics , philosophy
The dietary value of a prey type varies with its nutritional status and hence with its C:N:P content. However, while stoichiometric differences between a heterotroph and its food must affect growth efficiency (GE), and thence trophic dynamics, other factors related to food quality may act as powerful modulators of predator-prey interactions. Thus, minor changes in prey stoichiometry can be associated with more significant changes in prey quality (production of toxins, mucus, thicker walls etc.) that may have a disproportionate effect on predation rates and GE. We term the predator response to such events, "stoichiometric modulations". Often these modulations are negative, decreasing predation and assimilation rates. We suggest that due consideration should be given in the construction of multinutrient based models of predators to the processes of prey selectivity, ingestion and digestion as functions of food quality and quantity.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom