z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Brothers all? The Operation of the Electoral College in the 2010 Labour Leadership Contest
Author(s) -
Hugh Pemberton,
Mark WickhamJones
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
parliamentary affairs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.01
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1460-2482
pISSN - 0031-2290
DOI - 10.1093/pa/gss012
Subject(s) - nomination , contest , voting , ideology , artificiality , political science , normative , political economy , sociology , public administration , law , public relations , politics , epistemology , philosophy
*This article analyses the wealth of data released by the Labour Party on its 2010 leadership election. We uncover the way in which the list of candidates was expanded via the initial nomination process in the parliamentary Labour Party and highlight the artificiality of some candidacies. We find little evidence in the voting data to support the belief that the Miliband brothers represented two sides of an ideological divide but highlight the profound importance of union nominations in the overall outcome. In the process, our analysis raises significant questions about the practical viability and normative desirability of the electoral college.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom