z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Capital-market Liberalization, Globalization, and the IMF
Author(s) -
Joseph E. Stiglitz
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
oxford review of economic policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.948
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1460-2121
pISSN - 0266-903X
DOI - 10.1093/oxrep/grh004
Subject(s) - economics , globalization , liberalization , capital (architecture) , capital market , international economics , monetary economics , macroeconomics , keynesian economics , market economy , finance , archaeology , history
One of the most controversial aspects of globalization is capital-market liberalization--not so much the liberalization of rules governing foreign direct investment, but those affecting short-term capital flows, speculative hot capital that can come into and out of a country. In the 1980s and 1990s, the IMF and the US Treasury tried to push capital-market liberalization around the world, encountering enormous opposition, not only from developing countries, but from economists who were less enamoured of the doctrines of free and unfettered markets, of market fundamentalism, that were at that time being preached by the international economic institutions. The economic crises of the late 1990s and early years of the new millennium, which were partly, or even largely, attributable to capital-market liberalization, reinforced those reservations. This paper takes as its point of departure a recent IMF paper, to provide insights both into how the IMF could have gone so wrong in its advocacy of capital-market liberalization and into why capital-market liberalization has so often led to increased economic instability, not to economic growth. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom