Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change?
Author(s) -
Cameron Hepburn,
Brian O’Callaghan,
Nicholas Stern,
Joseph E. Stiglitz,
Dimitri Zenghelis
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
oxford review of economic policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.948
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1460-2121
pISSN - 0266-903X
DOI - 10.1093/oxrep/graa015
Subject(s) - covid-19 , economics , climate change , natural resource economics , macroeconomics , medicine , virology , biology , ecology , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty) , outbreak
The COVID-19 crisis is likely to have dramatic consequences for progress on climate change. Imminent fiscal recovery packages could entrench or partly displace the current fossil-fuel-intensive economic system. Here, we survey 231 central bank officials, finance ministry officials, and other economic experts from G20 countries on the relative performance of 25 major fiscal recovery archetypes across four dimensions: speed of implementation, economic multiplier, climate impact potential, and overall desirability. We identify five policies with high potential on both economic multiplier and climate impact metrics: clean physical infrastructure, building efficiency retrofits, investment in education and training, natural capital investment, and clean R&D. In lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) rural support spending is of particular value while clean R&D is less important. These recommendations are contextualised through analysis of the short-run impacts of COVID-19 on greenhouse gas curtailment and plausible medium-run shifts in the habits and behaviours of humans and institutions.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom