Perspectives of Young Women With Gynecologic Cancers on Fertility and Fertility Preservation: A Systematic Review
Author(s) -
Vânia Gonçalves,
Pedro Lopes Ferreira,
Mona Saleh,
Christina Tamargo,
Gwendolyn P. Quinn
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
the oncologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1549-490X
pISSN - 1083-7159
DOI - 10.1093/oncolo/oyab051
Subject(s) - fertility , fertility preservation , medicine , oncofertility , gynecology , family medicine , referral , obstetrics , population , environmental health
Background Gynecologic cancers standard treatment often requires the removal of some reproductive organs, making fertility preservation a complex challenge. Despite heightened oncofertility awareness, knowledge about fertility attitudes and decisions of young patients with gynecologic cancer is scarce. The aim of this systematic review was to highlight what is currently known about knowledge, attitudes, and decisions about fertility, fertility preservation, and parenthood among these patients. Methods Peer-reviewed journals published in English were searched in PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE from January 1, 2000 to July 1, 2020. Childbearing, fertility, fertility preservation, pregnancy, and parenthood attitudes/decisions after gynecologic cancer from women’s perspective were evaluated. Results A total of 13 studies comprised the review. Most of the women valued fertility preservation procedures that could be regarded as a means to restore fertility. A unique feature identified was that fertility preservation was seen also as a way to restore gender identity perceived to be lost or threatened during diagnosis and treatment. Fertility counseling was suboptimal, with wide variability among studies reviewed. Comparisons between gynecologic cancers and other cancer types about fertility counseling rates were inconclusive. The potential negative impact of impaired fertility on patients’ mental health and quality of life was also documented. Conclusions Fertility and parenthood were important matters in patients’ lives, with the majority of patients expressing positive attitudes toward future childbearing. Results confirm that the inclusion of patients with gynecologic cancer in research studies focusing on this topic still remains low. Additionally, the provision of fertility counseling and referral by health professionals is still suboptimal.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom