z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Beyond the Present-Fault Paradigm: Expanding Mens rea Definitions in the General Part
Author(s) -
John Child,
Adrian Hunt
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
oxford journal of legal studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.497
H-Index - 29
eISSN - 1464-3820
pISSN - 0143-6503
DOI - 10.1093/ojls/gqab033
Subject(s) - mens rea , sociology , computer science , criminology , criminal law
This article explores the use of mens rea terms in the criminal general part. We contend the current law fails properly to conceptualise mens rea for a large category of offences, namely bespoke/substantive inchoate offences, attempt, conspiracy, assisting and encouraging, and the general offence of complicity. These offences involve two conduct events: one in the present and one in future. However, current mens rea terms are defined as if applied to the more conventional category of criminal offence which only involves present conduct—a practice which we term the ‘present-fault paradigm’. We explore the limits of current mens rea terms, defined for present-conduct targets (circumstances and results), when applied to future-conduct ulterior targets within inchoate and complicity offences. We contend that current mens rea definitions and analysis within the general part are inappropriate for targeting elements related to future conduct/offending, and we suggest more appropriate bases for conceptualising such mens rea.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here