Pater Knows Best: Withdrawal of Medical Treatment from Infants in Scotland
Author(s) -
Jonathan Brown,
Sarah Christie
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
oxford journal of legal studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.497
H-Index - 29
eISSN - 1464-3820
pISSN - 0143-6503
DOI - 10.1093/ojls/gqaa019
Subject(s) - jurisdiction , context (archaeology) , law , autonomy , session (web analytics) , political science , english law , psychology , history , business , archaeology , advertising
The cases of Charlie Gard and Alfie Evans placed the withdrawal of treatment from terminally ill infants at the forefront of medical law and ethics. In the medico-legal context, Scottish court procedures materially differ from those in England. This article considers these differences in light of the possibility that a similar case might soon be called before the Scottish courts. The Court of Session would then be required to consider whether to utilise its parens patriae jurisdiction to consent to the withdrawal of treatment as if it were the parent of the infant. The operation of this jurisdiction is such that the outcome of any Scottish case cannot be said to be certain, as the Scottish courts are bound to pay more heed to parental autonomy than their English counterparts do.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom