English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Studies suggest up to 60% of antibiotics prescribed in the intensive care units (ICUs) may not be optimized. The antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) at Abbott Northwestern consists of infectious diseases trained pharmacists, pharmacy residents, and/or advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) pharmacy students and provides prospective audits and feedback on all inpatients not being seen by infectious diseases specialists and currently receiving any anti-infectives. Comprehensive daily profile reviews are performed and recommendations are communicated via a physician sticky note in the electronic medical record (EMR) and/or via a direct page. Beginning January 2018, the AST started reviewing patients in the two ICU units earlier to ensure recommendations were completed prior to multidisciplinary rounds. The AST also initiated sending a message within the EMR alerting the decentral pharmacists prior to rounds. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on recommendations made by the AST between February and April 2017 (control group) and February and April 2018 (intervention group) for patients on two ICU units (ICU 1 and ICU 2). Time to acceptance and acceptance rates were calculated for the control and intervention period. A one-tailed t-test was performed for the time to acceptance analysis and a Chi-squared test was performed to compare acceptance rates. Results were deemed statistically significant when P &lt; 0.05. Results Time to acceptance for the recommendations showed a significant decrease from 25.9 to 13.7 hours with the new process in ICU 1 (P = 0.038). Provider acceptance rate increased significantly from 77.8% to 88.4% in ICU 2 (P = 0.037). Conclusion Changing the workflow of the prospective audit and feedback process by the AST had a meaningful impact by decreasing the response time (time to acceptance) and increasing acceptance rates of the recommendations in the ICUs. The revised process improved communication between the AST, decentral pharmacist, and attending provider, which in turn may have contributed to the positive outcomes. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

1073. Analysis of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Recommendation Process in the Intensive Care Units at a Large Tertiary Community Hospital