z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
1052. Antimicrobial Stewardship: On Board with Lean Daily Management System
Author(s) -
Elizabeth Monsees,
Ann Wirtz,
Angela Myers,
Alaina Burns,
Christopher Day,
Rana E. El Feghaly,
Brian Lee,
Amol Purandare,
Gina Weddle,
Jennifer Goldman
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofz360.916
Subject(s) - accountability , workload , staffing , workflow , stewardship (theology) , process management , teamwork , antimicrobial stewardship , metric (unit) , computer science , medicine , knowledge management , business , operations management , nursing , engineering , antibiotics , microbiology and biotechnology , antibiotic resistance , biology , database , politics , political science , law , operating system
Background Limited guidance exists on how to design and measure the efficiency and effectiveness of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). Our established ASP sought to broaden interprofessional accountability and enhance our programmatic efficiency by employing Lean Daily Management System (DMS) procedures. Methods To improve ASP communication, a visual and systematic approach to identify, address, and resolve ASP projects while quantifying nontraditional metrics measuring the efficiency and effectiveness was developed. Through shared discussions, an interdisciplinary group of stakeholders produced the following deliverables: (a) established shared programming goals/metrics; (b) improved prioritization methods and project tracking through completion; (c) developed readiness and metric boards to display achievements, current activity, and metrics; (d) identified programming threats and strategies to strengthen our provided services. Results At 6 months following DMS adoption, our ASP has disbanded monthly meetings in lieu of weekly, 15 minute huddles utilizing the readiness and metric boards. We achieved consistent and interprofessional representation where each member is accountable for leading huddles, providing reports, and owning projects. Using a stoplight color system to indicate status, potential ASP influencers are tracked and reported: clinical workload/demands, organizational awareness, equipment/supplies, staffing, project updates, and announcements. The visual identification allows the team to address “quick hits” or escalate resource allocation to solve “big issues” (figure). Program metrics are codified under the domains of delivery, people, quality, safety, and financial stewardship. Administrative leadership has attended huddles and provided positive and constructive feedback to foster a process of continuous improvement. Conclusion Integration of Lean DMS huddles provides a collaborative, interactive and interdisciplinary approach to enhance shared awareness and to broaden the reach and efficiency of our ASP. With project tracking mechanisms in place, our team is refining our problem-solving abilities to ensure a congruent plan between issues raised and established program metrics. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom