z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
744. Antifungal De-escalation Strategy in ICU Patients: Clinical Success and Cost Savings
Author(s) -
Eleni Magira,
Athanasia-Aikaterini Kalogianni,
Spyros Zakynthinos
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofz360.812
Subject(s) - medicine , fluconazole , echinocandins , de escalation , intensive care medicine , incidence (geometry) , amphotericin b , candida albicans , empiric therapy , antifungal , caspofungin , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , optics , physics , alternative medicine , dermatology , pathology
Background The incidence of Candida spp infections in critically ill patients is increasing. Initial broad-spectrum empiric antifungal agents (e.g., echinocandins), followed by immediate switching to fluconazole if isolates are fluconazole sensitive could be a low-cost de-escalation strategy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the budget impact of the de-escalation strategy using fungostatin in ICU patients and clinical effectiveness. Methods This prospective study was conducted in a 30-bed mixed ICU, from January 2015 through January 2017. Critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis were placed on initial empiric broad-spectrum antifungal agents either on echinocandins or liposomal amphoteric B. De-escalation to fungostatin strategy at day 3 vs. patients without de-escalation were compared. Clinical characteristics and the presence of clinical success by the eighth-day of treatment and 28-day outcome were evaluated. Clinical success was defined as the complete eradication of Candida spp. in blood cultures. Economic outcomes included budget impact was also evaluated. Results Forty-seven ICU patients with documented invasive candidemia enrolled and received empiric broad-spectrum antifungal agents with either echinocandins or liposomal amphotericin B. Of those, 22 (47%) were eligible for de-escalation at day 3 to fungostatin based on susceptibility test for fungi. Specific Candida species isolated in the de-escalation group were C. albicans (14, 64%), and non-C. albicans (8, 36%). Interestingly 6/22 (27%) invasive candidemia de-escalated cases relapsed by day 8 of initiation of the empiric therapy, vs. 2/25 (8%) of the control group (P = 0.12). Survival rates at day 28 were not statistically significant among the two groups [15/22 (68%) vs. 11/25 (44%), P = 0.12]. The budget impact of using de-escalation was greater, producing cost savings of €3,200 per patient but did not translate into significant clinical and mycological success. Conclusion Critically ill patients who had received empiric antifungal therapy for documented candidemia and underwent de-escalation from echinocandins or liposomal ambisome B to fungostatin had a potential economic cost–benefit but did not associate with significantly improved clinical success rates. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom