English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Fosfomycin is one of the antibiotics that may be a candidate for the next-generation antimicrobial agents againt multidrug-resistant bacteria. To date, it is known that the resistance rate is not high for Escherichia coli. However, it is necessary to update the fosfomycin resistance rates in E. coli according to the studies that extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing E. coli strains are highly resistance to fosfomycin. We evaluated the resistance rate of fosfomycin, the resistant mechanism of fosfomycin in E. coli, and the activity of fosfomycin against susceptible and resistant strains of E. coli. Methods A total of 283 clinical isolates was collected from patients with Escherichia coli species during the period of January 2018 to June 2018, in three tertiary hospitals of Republic of Korea. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed in all E. coli isolates using the broth microdilution method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of the Oxford scheme was conducted to determine the genotypes of E. coli isolated. Fosfomycin genes were investigated for all fosfomycin-resistant E. coli strains. Results The overall resistance rate to fosfomycin was 10.2%, compared with 53.4%, 46.3%, 41.3%, 31.1%, 10.6%, 2.5%, and 2.1% for ciprofloxacin, cefixime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, colistin, ertapenem, and amikacin, respectively. The 29 fosfomycin-resistant isolates did not show a clonal pattern on the phylogenetic tree. MurA and glp genes were identified in all strains. FosA3 were identified in two strains and uhp gene were identified in 4 strains. In time-kill curve studies, fosfomycin was more bactericidal than cefixime against all sensitive E. coli strain. Morever, fosfomycin was more bactericidal than piperacillin/tazobactam against ESBL-producing E. coli strain. Conclusion The resistant rate of fosfomycin to E. coli is still low. Fosfomycin was active against E. coli including ESBL producing strains. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

611. Fosfomycin Resistance of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli and Mechanisms of Fosfomycin Resistance