English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background The growing opioid epidemic is driving increasing rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in the United States. HCV transmission is most frequently attributed to unsafe injection behaviors, but can occur via other unsafe drug use and sexual behaviors. Differences in demographics, HCV rates and associated risk factors in non-injecting PWUD (NIPWUD), compared with people who inject drugs (PWID) must be understood in order to target elimination strategies. Methods Change is Philadelphia’s program to eliminate HCV among PWUD and enrollment includes HCV testing, linkage services, and an interviewer-administered survey including risk behaviors and healthcare engagement. This interim analysis includes the first 835 enrollees that identified as PWUD. For this analysis, PWID are enrollees who indicated ever injecting drugs and those who had not are NIPWUD. Results Among enrollees, 76% (N = 637) reported ever injecting drugs. PWIDs were younger and non-Hispanic (NH) white while NIPWUD were older and NH Black (age: P = 0.003; race/ethnicity: P < 0.0001). NIPWUDs had a high seropositivity rate though significantly lower than PWIDs (24% vs. 85%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Among PWID enrollees, 94% (N = 596) ever snorted. Of enrollees, 63% (N = 124) of NIPWUD and 56% (N = 356) of PWID identified having a PCP (P =0.07). PWIDs are more likely than NIPWUD to have overdosed (OD) (40% vs. 9%; P < 0.0001) though high rates of both groups ever witnessed an OD (84% vs. 67%, respectively). While 80% (N = 105) of NIPWUDs know how to use Narcan, 60% (N = 79) carry it, {94% (N = 503) and 71%(N = 381) in PWID, respectively}. NIPWUDs are more likely to be interested in drug treatment (P < 0.0001) and to have received it in the last 12 months (P = 0.0008). Conclusion Notable HCV infection exists among non-injecting PWUD reinforcing the need for harm reduction counseling and access to drug use equipment used for smoking and snorting. NIPWUD may be able to access drug and HCV treatment through PCPs and fatal ODs may be prevented by ensuring NIPWUDs have access to Narcan. In addition, PWID are likely to snort as well and should be counseled on non-injecting harm reduction methods. To succeed in micro elimination among PWUD, a focus on NIPWUDs as well as PWIDs is necessary to mitigate transmission of HCV. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

316. Hepatitis C and Engagement in Health Care Among Persons Who Inject Drugs and Persons Who Use Non-Injection Drugs, Philadelphia