1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients
Author(s) -
Noman Hussain,
Zohra Chaudhry,
Hira Rizvi,
Odaliz Abreu-Lanfranco,
Mayur Ramesh,
Ramon Del Busto,
Zachary Osborn,
George Alangaden
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofy210.967
Subject(s) - medicine , gold standard (test) , population , blood culture , retrospective cohort study , gastroenterology , surgery , antibiotics , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , environmental health
Background Blood culture (BC) the current “gold” standard for detection of candidemia has a sensitivity of ~50% and turnaround time (TAT) of 2–5 days. T2Candida Panel (T2) a magnetic resonance nano-diagnostic test done directly on blood samples detects C. albicans/C. tropicalis, C. krusei/C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis. Clinical trials of T2 showed good sensitivity, specificity, NPV 99% and TAT of 3–5 hours. The performance of T2 in high-risk transplant (Tx) population is unknown. T2 was implemented at our institution in October 2015. We evaluated the performance characteristics of T2 and BC in our Tx and non-transplant (non-Tx) patient populations. Methods This was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional evaluation of patients with suspected candidemia that had T2 done from October 2015 to October 2017 at a multihospital healthcare system in Detroit, MI. Performance characteristics of the T2 and BC in Tx and non-Tx patients were compared. BC obtained within 7 days before or after the T2 test were included in the analysis. TAT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated using positive BC as the standard. Differences between groups were assessed using two sample proportions testing at α = 0.05. Results A total of 1,272 patients with suspected candidemia had T2 done: 1,162 (91%) non-Tx and 110 (9%) Tx patients. Average TAT for T2 was 13 hours (5–41) vs. 34 hours (21–109) to initial positive BC result and 4 days (3–13) to species-specific BC result. In four non-Tx patients with negative T2, C. lusitaniae, C. dubliniensis, and C. kefyr were isolated in BC. Performance characteristics of T2 and BC in the two groups is shown (Table 1). Of the T2+/BC− cases (n = 102), 9% had retinitis and 9% had invasive candidiasis. Conclusion The rapid TAT, good sensitivity, and high NPV of T2 in Tx patients has clinical implications and can help support antifungal stewardship efforts in this population. The clinical significance of T2 positivity in the presence of negative BC needs further investigation. Table1: Performance Characteristics of T2 Compared with BC (N = 1,272) Tx (n = 110) Non-Tx (n = 1162) P-value T2 + and blood culture + 5 (4.5%) 35 (3.01%) 0.3917 T2 + and blood culture − 19 (17.3%) 86 (7.4%) 0.0003 T2 - and blood culture + 1 (0.9%) 41 (3.5%) 0.1431 Sensitivity 83.3% 46.1% Specificity 81.9% 92.4% PPV 20.8% 28.9% NPV 98.8% 96.2% Disclosures G. Alangaden, T2 Biosystems: Speaker’s Bureau, Educational grant and Speaker honorarium.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom