z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
238. Sharing Unit-Specific Stewardship Metrics With Front-line Providers to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing
Author(s) -
Nicholas J. Mercuro,
Rachel M. Kenney,
Raghavendra C. Vemulapalli,
Mariam Costandi,
Berta Rezik,
Charles T. Makowski,
Susan L. Davis
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofy210.249
Subject(s) - antimicrobial stewardship , medicine , psychological intervention , cohort , emergency medicine , guideline , intensive care medicine , audit , antimicrobial , family medicine , antibiotics , pediatrics , antibiotic resistance , nursing , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , chemistry , management , organic chemistry , pathology , economics
Background Inpatient antibiotics are estimated 30–50% inappropriate and novel antimicrobial stewardship (AS) strategies to engage prescribers are needed. The objective of this study was to describe the implementation of a customized antibiotic use and outcome report with family medicine (FAM) providers and the impact on prescribing behaviors for routine infections in hospitalized adults. Methods Single-center quasiexperiment before and after AS/FAM collaborative intervention. January–March 2017 Standard of Care: routine audit and feedback. FAM leadership worked with AS pharmacists to design reporting process. January–March 2018 Monthly Interventions: reports of antimicrobial use, appropriateness, harms; positive-deviance cases highlighting successful stewardship; education and survey of rotating FAM providers; handheld prescribing tools/guidelines. Consecutive admissions to the adult FAM ward with respiratory, urinary, and skin infections were evaluated. Primary endpoint: duration of optimal prescribing. Each day of therapy (DOT) was classified as optimal, suboptimal, unnecessary, or inappropriate. Antimicrobials were stratified by spectrum and propensity to cause harm. Secondary endpoints: use of broad-spectrum agents, appropriate duration of therapy, and safety. Results Adults (n = 150, 76 pre, 74 post) were similar in age, comorbid conditions, and antimicrobial indications (Figure 1). Following intervention, unnecessary antimicrobial days decreased from 2 to 0 days (P < 0.001) per patient, optimal therapy selection increased from 25% to 58% (P < 0.001). Narrow-spectrum agents increased from 41% to 59% (P = 0.05) while use of broader (52 vs. 48%) and extended spectrum agents (57 vs. 44%) were not significantly different in the cohort. Guideline concordant duration of therapy improved from 37% to 57% (P = 0.015). Concurrent unit-wide DOTs of broad and extended agents decreased (Figure 2). Conclusion Reporting unit-specific antimicrobial use, harms and successes, without change in standard audit and feedback, improved antimicrobial prescribing and quality of care. These findings support the need to engage front-line providers like FAM in stewardship interventions and reporting. Disclosures S. L. Davis, Achaogen: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Allergan: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Melinta: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Nabriva: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Zavante: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom