z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
2460. Factors Associated With Uptake of Meningococcus B Vaccination After an ACIP Category B Recommendation
Author(s) -
Emily Watkins,
Kristen A. Feemster
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2113
Subject(s) - medicine , medicaid , cohort , family medicine , receipt , pediatrics , comorbidity , demographics , retrospective cohort study , demography , health care , sociology , world wide web , computer science , economics , economic growth
Background Two meningococcal vaccines (MenB) were licensed for 10–25 year olds in 2015 and given a Category B recommendation with a preferred window of 16–18 years old without high-risk comorbidity. Little is known about uptake of MenB after a Category B recommendation. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 16–23 year olds presenting to 31 primary care sites in a pediatric care network October 23, 2015–April 30, 2017. Using pivot tables and chi square analysis, we examined EHR data for associations between MenB receipt and patient/provider demographics (patient age, sex, race, insurance; provider years in practice), vaccinations, care site (urban vs. suburban), and high-risk comorbidity (asplenia, sickle cell, complement deficiency). Results Of 45,428 patients, 51% were female, 68% were 16–18 years old, and 21% received ≥1 MenB. 43% of those patients completed the 2-dose series. Rates of MenACWY booster receipt (32%) exceeded MenB, and 28% received both vaccines. A higher proportion of patients with ≥1 MenB were Asian, older, and privately insured (Table 1). More privately insured patients completed the series (48% vs. 26% Medicaid, P < 0.001). 22% of high-risk patients received MenB, similar to their peers. MenB receipt increased with provider years in practice but declined in those practicing >30 years (Table 1). MenB initiation varied widely between sites (1–45%). Conclusion MenB uptake in this cohort was low. Variation by site, provider years in practice, and potential sociodemographic disparity suggests that advice and acceptance in the setting of a Category B recommendation is not uniform. Further study is needed to clarify how these factors influence MenB receipt in teens.Table 1: % 16–23 Year Olds With ≥1 MenB by Patient and Provider Characteristics Total (%) N = 45,428 % with ≥1 MenB N = 9,393 P-value Sex Female 23,167 (51) 21 0.31 Male 22,261 (49) 21 Age 16–18 31,307 (69) 18 <0.001 19–23 14,121 (31) 28 Race White 26,280 (58) 27 <0.001 Black 13,186 (29) 18 Asian 1,237 (27) 22 Insurance Medicaid 10,507 (23) 17 <0.001 Private 34,854 (77) 22 Vaccinations MenACWY 14,753 (33) 28 HPV 10,007 (22) 21 Tdap 619 (1.4) 23 Comorbidities Sickle cell 543 (1.2) 22 Complement deficiency 3 (0.007) 33 Asplenia 19 (0.04) 42 Prov. years in practice ≤10 7,564 (24) 16 11–20 9,205 (29) 18 21–30 9,330 (29) 19 >30 5,939 (17) 12 <0.001 Care site Urban 9,845 (22) 21 0.09 Suburban 35,583 (78) 20 Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom