English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background Biofilms are sophisticated communities of matrix-encased and surface-attached bacteria that exhibit a distinct and specific resistant/tolerant phenotype to almost all antibacterial agents, with activity reduced 10- to 1,000-fold. Interestingly, this augmented resistance rapidly reverts when bacteria detach from the biofilm and return to a planktonic state. However, in this in vitro pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model we are able to expose biofilms to shear rates that are consistent with human interface and mimic antibiotic penetration and diffusion pathways from serum antibiotic concentration in humans. Methods Methicillin-susceptible ATCC 29213 and MRSA 494 strains were evaluated. Initial susceptibility tests were performed by broth microdilution method. Time kill studies were performed to identify synergy patterns for liposomal and commercial antibiotics. Biofilm eradication was investigated using antibiotics vancomycin (VAN) (commercial) vs. liposomal VAN (VAN-L) (Patent#17-1460) and also combination of VAN- cefazolin (commercial) vs. liposomal vancomycin and liposomal cefazolin (CFZ-L) (Patent# 17-1460) in biofilms for strain MRSA 494. Biofilms were generated overnight using the BioFlux Microfluidic system (Fluxion BioSciences) at constant and continuous shear rates to optimize biofilm attachment and creation. Perfusion of antibiotic solutions (free peak concentration) was applied over a 24 h time period. Time lapse pictures were recorded to determine antibiotic biofilm eradication rates over 18h of incubation and pictures were analyzed using Bioflux Montage software. Results MIC values demonstrated a 2-fold reduction for liposomal vancomycin vs. commercial vancomycin. Also, combination of liposomal VAN MIC in presence of CFZ-L showed a 15.87-fold reduction in comparison to commercial VAN for 494. Overall, our biofilm results demonstrated a 43.6% improved eradication using VAN-L and CFZ-L combination in comparison to commercial VAN-CFZ combination. We also observed 5.7% improved eradication using VAN-L vs. commercial VAN. Conclusion Liposomal form of VAN and CFZ combinations are a promising approach to improved efficacy and reduced VAN resistance in S. aureus biofilms. Disclosures M. J. Rybak, Allergan: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Research grant and Research support. Achaogen: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. Bayer: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. Melinta: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. Merck: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. Theravance: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. Sunovian: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. Zavante: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support. NIAID: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support.

2391. Liposomal Vancomycin and Cefazolin Combinations for S. aureus Biofilms