English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Access to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is often poor in small urban and rural areas due to long distances to PrEP providers and stigma. In 2017, the Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH), University of Iowa (UI), and community representatives collaborated to develop a public health-partnered telemedical PrEP delivery model to overcome these barriers (TelePrEP). IDPH personnel working in five sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics and partner services (PS) programs in Eastern Iowa screened clients for PrEP indications and referred those with need to TelePrEP pharmacist providers at UI. Via collaborative practice, pharmacists completed initial and follow-up PrEP home video visits with clients on smart phones and laptops. Clients obtained laboratory monitoring and STI screening in public health-affiliated and local laboratories in accordance with USPHS/CDC guidelines, and received PrEP medication by mail. PS personnel linked TelePrEP clients with newly-identified STIs to local treatment. Methods Using the PrEP continuum as framework, we used IDPH databases and UI medical records to conduct a retrospective process evaluation of the TelePrEP model (February 2017–April 2018). Results TelePrEP received 44 referrals from public health and 59 self-referrals via advertising. Pharmacists completed 84 initial visits (81% of referrals), including 37 visits (84%) with clients referred by public health. Most (94%) started emtricitabine/tenofovir after initial visits. Retention in TelePrEP at 6 months was 87%. 96% of guideline-indicated laboratory tests (HIV, creatinine, STI, hepatitis) were completed at baseline and follow-up. Rates of extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea screening were lower (74 of 104 completed screens) due to variable availability of swabs at local laboratories. 15 clients were diagnosed with 20 STIs on screening (6 syphilis, four gonorrhea, 10 chlamydia) and one unrecognized pregnancy was identified. PS linked all clients with STIs on screens to treatment within 14 days (80% in 3 days). Conclusion Using telemedicine, healthcare systems can partner with public health administered STI clinics and PS programs to create virtual PrEP delivery models in rural settings. Public health partnerships enhance client identification and ensure linkage to care for new STI diagnoses in telemedicine programs. Disclosures A. Hoth, Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Research team member, Research support. M. Ohl, Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Grant Investigator, Research grant.

1299. Iowa TelePrEP: Preliminary Experience with a Public Health-Partnered, Telemedical PrEP Delivery Model in a Rural State