English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

updated) Background: Despite widespread utilization of contact precautions for endemic MRSA control, there is no direct evidence available regarding the efficacy of this measure to reduce HAIs. This study reports the findings of replacing MRSA contact with standard precautions and introducing chlorhexidine-gluconate (CHG) bathing for all inpatients. Methods: The impact of discontinuing MRSA contact precautions was assessed in a pre/post design over a 23 month time period in a tertiary care hospital. MRSA outcome measures were NHSN LabID events, clinical bacteremia, CLABSI, CAUTI, pVAP, SSI, healthcare associated pneumonia (HAP), and MRSA high risk patient surveillance screening (admission and transfer screening to ICUs). Projected cost savings were calculated. Results: MRSA contact precautions were lifted mid-September 2015 (month not included in analysis). No increases in NHSN LabID event and clinical MRSA bacteremia (OR: 1.12 [95%CI: 0.71, 1.77]; p=0.66; OR: 0.92 [95%CI: 0.49, 1.72]; p=0.88), CLABSI (OR: 1.53 [0.64, 3.94]; p=0.32), Colon SSI (deep, organ space) (OR: 1.02 [0.07, 14.10]; p>0.99), HAP (OR: 1.05 [0.56, 1.99]; p=0.88), and pVAP (OR: 3.32 [0.58, 32.80]; p=0.17) were observed in the following eleven months. There were no MRSA CAUTI pre and one CAUTI post intervention reported (p>0.99). No MRSA abdominal hysterectomy SSI were detected. Surveillance screening revealed a nonsignificant increase in MRSA conversion rate (OR: 1.27 [0.86, 1.85]; p=0.22). Based on an isolation rate of 10% for MRSA in the pre intervention phase and an estimated average of 25 room entries/day requiring gowns and gloves, a total annual savings of $80,000 to $230,000 were calculated taking into account different gown and gloves types and subtracting the additional costs of CHG soap. Conclusion: Replacement of contact with standard precautions for MRSA combined with the introduction of CHG bathing of all inpatients did not negatively affect occurrence of MRSA HAIs. Besides substantial cost savings, this may improve patient satisfaction by easier access and less stigmatization, and reduce personnel time used for donning and removal of gowns and gloves.

Lifting Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolation: Effect on MRSA Infection Measures