English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Although rapid molecular diagnostic tests for tuberculosis (TB) have decreased detection time of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug resistance, whether their use improves clinical care and outcomes is uncertain. To address these knowledge gaps, we evaluated whether use of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay impacts treatment and clinical outcome metrics among patients treated for sputum smear-negative multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients initiating treatment for sputum smear-negative MDR-TB at the National Center for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases in Tbilisi, Georgia from 2011 to 2016. The Xpert MTB/RIF was introduced in Georgia in 2010 and implemented into programmatic use in 2014. Exposure was availability of an Xpert result at time of diagnosis. Time to second-line treatment initiation, sputum culture conversion, and end-of-treatment outcomes were determined. Time to event was compared using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results Among 151 patients treated for sputum smear-negative MDR-TB (96% culture positive), the Xpert was utilized in the clinical management of 78 (52%) patients and not used in 73 (48%). An adjusted analysis controlling for potential confounders found that patients in the Xpert group had shorter median time to second-line treatment (13 vs 56 days; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 10.21; P &amp;lt; .0001) and culture conversion (61 vs 93 days; aHR, 1.93; P &amp;lt; .001). There was no difference in treatment outcomes. Conclusions Use of the Xpert in the management of sputum smear-negative MDR-TB decreases time to second-line therapy and sputum culture conversion, providing evidence of its clinical impact and supporting its programmatic utility.

open forum infectious diseases

Xpert MTB/RIF Use Is Associated With Earlier Treatment Initiation and Culture Conversion Among Patients With Sputum Smear-Negative Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis