English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background  The utility of surveillance bronchoscopy (SB) in asymptomatic lung transplant recipients (LTR) is controversial. Guidelines regarding the timing of SB and diagnostic testing varies across centers. Studies evaluating the role of microbiologic testing are lacking. Our transplant institute currently performs SB at week 1, and months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 post-transplant. We evaluated if routine microbiologic testing obtained during SB impacted clinical management.Methods  This observational cohort study was performed at Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI and included all LTR done from August 2014 to August 2019. Clinical and laboratory data was abstracted from the electronic medical record Pre/post-SB. Bronchoscopies performed for new or worsening respiratory symptoms, decline in forced expiratory volume at one second ≥10%, new radiographic abnormalities and follow up bronchoscopies to assess stents or recent acute rejection were excluded. Microbiologic tests assessed are shown in Table 2. Management change was defined as reduction in immunosuppression or prescription of antimicrobials. Rate of change in clinical management based on microbiologic test positivity was the primary outcome. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.Results  449 SB in 107 LTR were evaluated. Median age was 63 years, 68% were male. The average number of SB performed per patient was 4.2 (Table 1). The most common microbiologic tests performed were bacterial (435), mycobacterial (427), and fungal including  Pneumocystis jirovecii  (1022) (Table 2). The rate of test positivity and resultant change in management are shown in Table 3. The rate of test positivity was highest for bacterial (54%), fungal (27%) and viral tests (6%) with management changes in 12%, 2%, and 3% respectively.  Table 1. Patient DemographicsTable 2. Rate of Microbiologic Testing per Surveillance BronchoscopyTable 3. Rate of Microbiologic Positivity and Management Change per Surveillance BronchoscopyConclusion  This is the largest study to specifically evaluate the role of routine microbiologic tests during SB in LTR. Bacterial cultures may be appropriate due to higher rates of management changes. However, routine fungal, AFB, and viral studies are unnecessary due to low true positivity, and consequent low rate of management changes. This represents an important opportunity for diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship.    Disclosures    All Authors : No reported disclosures

593. Utility of Microbiologic Testing Obtained via Bronchoalveolar Lavage on Asymptomatic Lung Transplant Recipients: A Quality Improvement Study