489. SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence and Antibody Response Among Pregnant People in Seattle, WA
Author(s) -
Sylvia M. LaCourse,
Alisa Kachikis,
Kelsey Kinderknecht,
Romeo R. Galang,
Lauren B. Zapata,
Krissy M Yamamoto,
Carol C Salerno,
Alexander L. Greninger,
Janet A. Englund,
Alison L. Drake
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofab466.688
Subject(s) - medicine , interquartile range , seroprevalence , antibody , medical record , longitudinal study , pediatrics , immunology , serology , pathology
Background Antenatal care is a unique opportunity to assess SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and antibody response in pregnant people, including those with previously unknown infection.Methods Pregnant people were screened for SARS-CoV-2 IgG during antenatal care or delivery in Seattle, Washington with Abbott Architect chemiluminescent immunoassay which provides quantitative index (positive ≥1.4). Participants with IgG+ results or identified with RT-PCR+ results via medical records were invited to enroll in a longitudinal evaluation of antibody responses. We report preliminary results of an ongoing seroprevalence and longitudinal study with planned 18-month follow-up. Results Between September 9, 2020–May 7, 2021, we screened 1304 pregnant people; 62 (4.8%) tested SARS-CoV-2 IgG+, including 28 (45%) with known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among participants testing IgG+, median age was 32 years (interquartile range [IQR] 26–35) and median gestational age was 21 weeks (IQR 12–38) at screening; median IgG index was 3.2 (IQR 2.1–4.9, range 1.4–9.9), including 3.9 (IQR 2.3–5.8) among those with vs. 2.7 (IQR 1.9–4.2) among those without prior RT-PCR+ results (p=0.05 by Wilcoxon rank-sum). Of 30 longitudinal study participants enrolled, 24 tested IgG+ at baseline (75% with prior RT-PCR+ result) and 6 tested IgG- on enrollment but were identified as previously RT-PCR+ via medical records; 24/30 (80%) reported previous symptoms. Of 24 participants testing IgG+ at baseline, 14 (58%) had first follow-up IgG results at median of 66 days (IQR 42–104) since initial testing, with median IgG index of 2.0 (IQR 1.0–3.8). 9/14 (64%) participants with repeat IgG testing remained IgG+ at first follow-up ( ≤ 280 days after first RT-PCR+ result for those with and ≥ 104 days after first IgG detection for those without prior RT-PCR+ results), while 5/14 (26%) had a negative Abbott IgG test at a median of 81 days (IQR 75–112) since initial testing.Conclusion Nearly half of pregnant people testing SARS-CoV-2 IgG+ reported no known prior SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis or symptoms. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response and durability in pregnancy has implications for maternal and neonatal protection and susceptibility and highlights potential benefits of vaccination in this population. Disclosures Sylvia LaCourse, MD , Merck (Grant/Research Support) Alisa Kachikis, MD, MS , GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant) Pfizer (Consultant) Alexander L. Greninger, MD, PhD , Abbott (Grant/Research Support) Gilead (Grant/Research Support) Merck (Grant/Research Support) Janet A. Englund, MD , AstraZeneca (Consultant, Grant/Research Support) GlaxoSmithKline (Research Grant or Support) Meissa Vaccines (Consultant) Pfizer (Research Grant or Support) Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant) Teva Pharmaceuticals (Consultant) Alison Drake, PhD, MPH , Merck (Grant/Research Support)
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom