English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background  Patients who are hospitalized with Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) are known to have increased risk for thrombosis. Several mechanisms have been proposed for increased thrombogenesis, including antiphospholipid antibodies (APLs). We sought to better understand the relationship between a commonly used marker of thrombosis, D-dimer, and antiphospholipid antibodies in relation to thrombosis in COVID-19.Methods  This was a single-center prospective cohort study. Participants were adults admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 between March and December of 2020. Included patients required a positive COVID-19 nasopharyngeal nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), coagulation studies, and regular assessment of D-dimer levels. Patients who were excluded were pregnant adults, use of oral anticoagulants prior to admission, and absence of a positive COVID-19 nasopharyngeal NAAT. We tested 52 patients for antiphospholipid antibodies (APLs), including lupus anticoagulant (LA), anti-beta-2 glycoprotein antibodies (B2GP), and anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL). The endpoint for analysis was hospital discharge or development of a confirmed thrombosis.Results  Twenty-nine of fifty-two patients (55.7%) with COVID-19 had non-negative APLs. Of these patients, twenty-seven (93.1%) had non-negative aCLs, the majority of which were IgM antibodies. There was a total of 7 thrombotic events in our cohort. The sensitivity of D-dimer alone was 85% and the sensitivity of APLs alone was 71%. In patients with an intermediate D-dimer level (i.e., greater than 2 milligrams per liter (mg/L) but less than 5 mg/L), the addition of non-negative APLs increased the sensitivity of D-dimer to 100%. In patients with a high D-dimer (i.e., greater than 5), the combined sensitivity of D-dimer and APLs was 60%. Out of the 7 thrombotic events in our cohort, two patients had negative APLs, however both patients had a D-dimer of greater than 5 mg/L.Conclusion  The use of APLs can assist in risk-stratifying patients in an intermediate-risk D-dimer group to consider prophylactic anticoagulation if APLs are negative and to consider therapeutic anticoagulation if APLs are non-negative. In the high-risk group (i.e., a D-dimer greater than 5 mg/dL), a therapeutic anticoagulation approach may be more appropriate.Disclosures    All Authors : No reported disclosures

302. Using Antiphospholipid Antibody Presence as an Additional Biomarker to Identify COVID-19 Positive Patients with High Risk for Thrombosis