English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background  Women living with HIV (WLWH) experience high rates of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and increased risk of cervical cancer. High-risk HPV (HR-HPV) types 16/18 cause most cervical precancers and cancers in women with and without HIV. However, contributions of other HR-HPV types to cervical disease among WLWH are not fully understood. We compared CIN2+ cases (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher or adenocarcinoma in situ) and the association between non-16/18 HPV types among women with and without HIV.Methods  Davidson County, Tennessee, women aged 18-39 years with CIN2+ diagnosed between 2008-2016 with HPV genotyping were included. HIV status, demographics, and histology were abstracted from medical records. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic factors were derived from  Integrated Public Use Microdata Series.  Archived cervical tissue was tested for 37 HPV types to define CIN2+ cases negative for HPV 16/18, regardless of presence of other HR-HPV strains. Characteristics of women with CIN2+ and HPV typing patterns were compared between women with and without HIV using Wilcoxon and Chi-square tests. Logistic regression assessed the association of non-16/18 HPV types and HIV infection, adjusting for age, race, calendar year, insurance, HPV vaccination, and neighborhood socioeconomic factors (selected a priori).Results  Among 2,116 women included, 1,093 (52%) had neither HPV16 nor HPV18. Compared to women without HIV, the 27 WLWH included were more likely to be >30 years of age, Black race, and live in neighborhoods with higher measures of poverty (Table 1). HPV types did not statistically differ by HIV status, though WLWH had a higher number of HR-HPV types present (Table 2). HIV infection was not significantly associated with non-16/18 HPV type after adjusting for confounders (adjusted OR 0.86 [95%CI: 0.4-1.88]).Conclusion  Among women with CIN2+, HIV infection was not significantly associated with non-16/18 HPV types. However, WLWH had a higher number of high-risk HPV types detected. Our study was limited by the small number of WLWH included.Disclosures    All Authors : No reported disclosures

826. HIV Infection and HPV Genotype Patterns among Young Women with Advanced Cervical Neoplasia in Davidson County, Tennessee