88. Review of nursing home antibiotic stewardship citation deficiencies to identify opportunities to improve antibiotic stewardship implementation, 2018-2019
Author(s) -
Katryna A Gouin,
Andrea Cool,
Nimalie D. Stone,
Lauri A. Hicks,
Kara M. Jacobs Slifka,
Katherine Almendinger,
Holly Harmon,
David Gifford,
Pamela Truscott,
Sarah Kabbani
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofab466.088
Subject(s) - antibiotic stewardship , citation , stewardship (theology) , medicine , antimicrobial stewardship , medicaid , family medicine , nursing , antibiotics , political science , health care , antibiotic resistance , politics , law , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
Background Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) set standards for nursing homes (NH) and conduct inspections to assess adherence to regulatory requirements, including antibiotic stewardship implementation. NHs not meeting requirements are issued a citation. We reviewed text summaries for citations related to antibiotic stewardship to assess implementation in NHs. Methods We obtained publicly available antibiotic stewardship deficiency citations issued to NHs from 9/2018—7/2019 and NH characteristics data from CMS Nursing Home Compare. We used the χ2 test to compare characteristics of NHs with and without citations. We did a qualitative review of a randomly selected subset (318/635) of antibiotic stewardship citations and classified citations into one or more of four categories based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship: 1) Leadership & Accountability, 2) Action, 3) Tracking & Reporting, 4) Education (Fig 1). We developed subcategories based on our iterative review process to further describe the citations. Each citation was reviewed by two reviewers and yielded 95% agreement in categorization. Discordant citations were reviewed by a third reviewer, and core element categories with agreement by ≥2/3 reviewers were assigned, resulting in 99% agreement. Antibiotic Stewardship Citation Deficiency Category Common Themes and Examples from Citation Text from Qualitative Review of Antibiotic Stewardship Citation Deficiencies. Results There were 635 NH stewardship citation deficiencies across 44 states from 9/2018—7/2019. NHs with a citation were more likely to have < 100 beds (60% vs. 50%) and for-profit ownership (75% vs. 70%) (Table 1). Of the 318 reviewed citations, Action was cited in 67% of NHs; 115/213 had missing or incomplete criteria documented for antibiotic initiation. Tracking & Reporting was cited in 40% of NHs; 117/126 had missing or incomplete antibiotic or infection tracking logs. Leadership & Accountability was cited in 23% of NHs; 41/72 NHs had no stewardship policy available. Education was cited in 13% of NHs (Fig 2). Table 1. Characteristics of US Nursing Homes With and Without an Antibiotic Stewardship Citation Deficiency from 9/2018-7/2019. Figure 2. Types of Antibiotic Stewardship Citation Deficiencies in US Nursing Homes, 2018-2019, N=318. Conclusion The most common opportunities for improvement fell under appropriate assessment and documentation of criteria for antibiotic initiation at the resident and facility-level. Training NH staff to use available resources for antibiotic stewardship activities may improve implementation. Further evaluation to identify barriers to implementation is needed. Disclosures David Gifford, MD, MPH, American Healthcare Association (Employee)
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom