English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background Mucormycosis is a life-threatening infection that predominantly occurs in immunocompromised hosts. Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) and isavuconazole (ISAV) are commonly used antifungal drugs to treat mucormycosis. However, the efficacy of combination therapy of L-AMB + ISAV compared to monotherapy is unknown. We used an immunosuppressed mouse model of pulmonary mucormycosis to compare the efficacy of L-AMB + ISAV vs. either drug alone. Methods ICR mice were immunosuppressed with cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg) and cortisone acetate (500 mg/kg) on Days -2, +3, and +8 relative to intratracheal infection with 2.5 x 105 cells of Rhizopus delemar 99-880, or 2.5 x 106 cells of Mucor circinelloides. Treatment with L-AMB (10 mg/kg, given intravenously qd), ISAV (56 mg/kg, by oral gavage TID), or a combination of both started 8 h post-infection and continued through day +4. Placebo mice received vehicle control. Survival studies through day +21 and tissue fungal burden (by conidial equivalent [CE] using qPCR) on Day +4, served as primary and secondary endpoints. Results For mice (n=20) infected with R. delemar, L-AMB and ISAV equally prolonged median survival time and enhanced survival vs. placebo (19 and 16 days for L-AMB and ISAV, respectively, and overall survival of 50% for either drug alone, vs. 9 days and 5% overall survival for placebo, P&amp;lt; 0.002 for either drug vs. placebo by Log Rank test). Importantly, combination treatment enhanced median survival time (&amp;gt;21 days) and resulted in an overall survival of 80% (P&amp;lt; 0.05 vs. all treatments). Both antifungal drugs reduced tissue fungal burden of mice (n=10) lungs and brain by ~1.0-2.0 log vs. placebo-treated mice (P&amp;lt; 0.02 by Wilcoxon Rank Sum). Consistent with the survival data, treatment with combination therapy resulted in 2.0-3.5 log reduction in fungal burden of either organ vs. placebo and 1.0 log reduction vs. either drug alone (P&amp;lt; 0.005). Similar results were obtained using mice infected with M. circinelloides. Conclusion L-AMB + ISAV demonstrate greater activity vs. monotherapy treatment in immunosuppressed mice infected with either of two common causes of mucormycosis. These studies warrant further investigation of LAmB + ISAV combination therapy as an optimal therapy of human mucormycosis. Disclosures Therese Kitt, MD, Astellas Pharma (Employee) Ashraf S. Ibrahim, PhD, Astellas Pharma (Research Grant or Support)

745. Combination Treatment of Liposomal Amphotericin B and Isavuconazole is Synergistic in Treating Experimental Mucormycosis