English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Recognition of sepsis frequently occurs in the ED. To demonstrate the need to optimize antibiotic use for suspected sepsis and evaluate the reliability of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria in predicting bacterial infection, we quantified the rate of unnecessary intravenous (IV) broad-spectrum antibiotic use for suspected sepsis in the ED at an academic medical center. Methods Adult patients who were admitted to the ED between January 2018 and June 2018 with suspected sepsis (≥ 2 SIRS) and received ≥ 1 dose of IV broad-spectrum antibiotic were included in this retrospective study. The presence of bacterial infection was determined using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions, microbiologic, radiographic, and laboratory findings. Suspected infections lacked microbiologic data. The primary outcome was the percentage of confirmed and suspected infections. Secondary outcomes included 90-day Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and 90-day drug-resistant organism (DRO) infections. Results A total of 218 patients were included. The percentages of confirmed/suspected and absence of bacterial infections were 63.8% and 36.2%, respectively. Elevated SIRS (≥ 2) and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA; ≥ 2) scores were not associated with the presence of bacterial infections. 82% of patients were discharged from the ED. Antibiotic exposure in days of therapy in the ED and/or hospital admission did not significantly vary between patients with confirmed/suspected bacterial infection and those with absence of bacterial infections. Among patients who lacked evidence of bacterial infections, 44% were prescribed outpatient antibiotics after being discharged from the ED. 90-day CDI and DRO infections were identified in 7 and 6 patients, respectively, regardless of the presence of bacterial infections. Table 1. Baseline demographics of patients admitted to the ED with suspected sepsis Conclusion A third of the patients with suspected sepsis received IV broad-spectrum antibiotics in the ED but ultimately lacked bacterial infection. Our findings suggest that identification of bacterial infection and patients with sepsis using SIRS or qSOFA lack specificity and can lead to the overuse of unnecessary antibiotics in the ED. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

open forum infectious diseases

226. Evaluating the Unnecessary Use of Intravenous Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics in Patients Based on Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria in the Emergency Department (ED)