179. Integrating Antibiotic Stewardship Core Elements into Nurse Residency Programs
Author(s) -
Amy L Straley,
Ann Wirtz,
Elizabeth Monsees
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.223
Subject(s) - medicine , nursing , psychological intervention , antimicrobial stewardship , stewardship (theology) , call to action , patient safety , antibiotic stewardship , quality management , best practice , medical education , service (business) , health care , management , antibiotic resistance , marketing , politics , political science , law , economics , microbiology and biotechnology , business , biology , economic growth , antibiotics , economy
Background Background: In the 2019 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship (AS) Programs, 3 elements outline opportunities for nurse engagement: • Leadership Commitment, securing resources to support AS endeavors, including quality/safety work • Action, identifying new categories of nursing-based interventions • Education, engaging nurses in patient education Nurse Residency Programs (NRPs) enculturate newly licensed nurses (NLNs) into the profession and provide a platform for integrating NLNs into organizational initiatives, including AS. Methods Methods: To determine if NRPs were an avenue to integrate core elements, nursing leaders committed to using the NRP to engage NLNs in development of unit-based AS projects. Tenured nurses mentored NLNs on evidence-based quality improvement projects with an AS nurse serving as content expert. Over 2 years, 4 cohorts, 2 in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and 2 in Cardiology, applied a Lean problem-solving approach (A3) to identify and implement nurse-led AS projects. Results Results: Four A3s were completed; data collection varied by group (Figure 1). Year 1, PICU developed a handoff tool, and improved frequency of nurse to nurse communication regarding the indication, duration, and day of therapy for prescribed antibiotics. Year 2, PICU developed a tool to increase parent education encounters; frequency of interactions did not change. Year 1, Cardiology implemented educational initiatives; increased awareness of nurses’ role in AS (Figure 2). Year 2, Cardiology piloted a handoff tool to promote AS; nurse communication increased. In total, 4 NLN projects were presented to leaders and clinical staff exposing 18 NLNs, 6 tenured nurses, and over 400 clinical nurses to AS. Each cohort expressed challenges integrating AS into established processes during debriefing. Figure 1: Cohort Overview Figure 2: Example of Nursing-Driven A3 Conclusion Conclusions: Commitment by unit-leaders is crucial to mitigate challenges during the development of nurse-driven projects. NRPs serve as a central location to reach a large subset of nurses and shows potential for facilitating nursing-based AS interventions. Elements were integrated, through challenges remain with maintaining a standard data collection process and analysis within and across NLN cohorts. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom