z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
148. Post-Extraction Infection and Antibiotic Prescribing Among Veterans Receiving Dental Extractions
Author(s) -
Kaylee E Caniff,
Lisa R. Young,
Shawna Truong,
Gibson Gretchen,
M. Marianne Jurasic,
Linda Poggensee,
Margaret A. Fitzpatrick,
Charlesnika T. Evans,
Katie J. Suda
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.193
Subject(s) - medicine , antibiotics , veterans affairs , medical prescription , dental extraction , retrospective cohort study , cohort , dentistry , microbiology and biotechnology , pharmacology , biology
Background Dentists prescribe 10% of outpatient antibiotics in the United States, equating to 24.5 million prescriptions annually. However, there is a paucity of data regarding adjunctive antibiotic use in tooth extractions. This study compared post-extraction infections following dental extractions with and without adjunctive antibiotics. Post-extraction infection risk factors and antibiotic prescribing patterns were also investigated. Methods This was a retrospective cohort of Veterans with tooth extraction(s) in any Veterans Affairs dental clinic from 1/1/17-12/31/17. A stratified random sample was selected by geographic region, type of extraction (surgical/non-surgical) and post-extraction antibiotic receipt to ensure inclusion of subjects in each of these categories. Subjects who received an antibiotic were compared to those who did not for the occurrence of post-extraction infection as documented in the health record by infectious signs/symptoms or diagnosis. Multivariable regression was performed to identify factors associated with antibiotic receipt. Results A sample size of 374 was needed to achieve statistical power based on a 10% risk of infection post-extraction. Nationally, 69,610 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 404 were randomly selected for inclusion. Antibiotics were prescribed to 154 patients (38.1%). There was no difference in post-extraction oral infection among subjects who did and did not receive antibiotics (4.5% vs. 3.2%, p=0.59). Risk factors for post-extraction infection could not be identified due to the low frequency of this outcome. Subjects who received antibiotic prescriptions were more likely to have a greater number of teeth extracted (OR=1.1; 95% CI 1.03–1.2), documentation of acute infection at time of extraction (OR=3.0; 95% CI 1.6–5.8), molar extraction (OR=1.8; 95% CI 1.1–2.9) and extraction performed by an oral maxillofacial surgeon (OR=2.3; 95% CI 1.5–3.6) or specialty dentist (OR=5.8; 95% CI 2.1–16.2). Conclusion Infectious complications were not significantly different among Veterans undergoing tooth extraction who did and did not receive post-extraction antibiotics. Antibiotic prescribing for tooth extraction may be a potential area of focus for outpatient antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom