z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
138. Focused Outpatient Antibiograms: Time for Widespread Implementation?
Author(s) -
Sabina Manandhar,
Paul Cook,
Michael Schwartz,
Heather M. Duncan
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.183
Subject(s) - medicine , antimicrobial stewardship , antibiogram , medical prescription , intervention (counseling) , family medicine , antibiotics , antibiotic resistance , nursing , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
Background Significant antimicrobial use occurs in outpatient settings, making this an important area for expanding stewardship. Data show over 260 million annual prescriptions in the U.S. Family practitioners prescribed the most antibiotic courses (24%)1. Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) comprise one of the most common indications for antibiotics. In this study, antibiogram data were compiled for urinary isolates of E coli collected from all outpatients as well as Family Medicine-specific (FM) clinics in an academic medical center in Eastern NC. The objective is to identify susceptibility variations for E. coli from urine isolates specific to combined outpatient and academic FM clinics compared to composite non-intensive care unit (ICU) data. Also, assess impact of providers’ knowledge/access to a focused antibiogram on choice of empiric therapy. Methods Data were electronically obtained from the microbiology laboratory at Vidant Health (VH), a large regional system serving over 1.4 million people from 29 counties in Eastern NC. All urine cultures with E. coli from 9/2018 - 9/2019 were included. Two focused antibiograms were then developed via MedMind. A pre and post intervention survey was conducted with FM practitioners, including residents. Intervention was defined as a brief talk to educate providers about variations identified via focused antibiograms. Survey results were compared to assess for intent to change practice. Results Pre-survey data are noted in Figure 1. Post-survey changes are described in Figure 2 noting that 100% of respondents now felt a need to have access to focused antibiogram data. There were 1107 E coli urinary isolates for all outpatients and 104 for FM clinics only. Figure 3 highlights key differences in antibiogram data, especially enhanced susceptibilities for common antibiotics in FM-specific clinics when compared to composite institutional data. Pre-Intervention Survey Post-Intervention Survey Comparison of Antibiogram Conclusion Composite hospital antibiograms may not be optimal for determining empiric UTI treatment in the community and antibiotic selections thought to be suboptimal in an institution may be effective in outpatient settings. Thus, antibiograms developed specifically for outpatient clinics, especially in academic centers, have potential to greatly enhance appropriate care. Disclosures Paul P. Cook, MD, Contrafect (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Leonard-Meron (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Lilly (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom