English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background AmpC overproduction is a main mechanism of carbapenem resistance, in the absence of acquired carbapenemases. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has potent in vitro activity against AmpC-producing P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales that are resistant to carbapenems and other β-lactams. Methods Activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators was evaluated against AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales (n=77) and P. aeruginosa (n=53) collected from 4 CAZ-AVI clinical trials: RECLAIM (complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI]), REPRISE (cIAI/complicated urinary tract infection [cUTI]), RECAPTURE (cUTI) and REPROVE (hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator associated pneumonia). In vitro susceptibility of CAZ-AVI and comparators was performed by broth microdilution using ThermoFisher custom panels. CLSI breakpoints were used to determine susceptibility. Quantitative PCR and microarray data were used to characterize presence and expression of AmpC. Clinical response at test of cure was assessed. Results Against 77 AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales isolates, meropenem-vaborbactam (MVB) (98.7% susceptible [S]), CAZ-AVI (96.1% S), and meropenem (MEM) (96.1% S) had similar in vitro activity (Table), with greater in vitro activity than amikacin (AMK) (84.4% S), gentamicin (61.0% S), and ceftolozane-tazobactam (TZC) (35.1% S). Clinical cures in patients with baseline AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales were 21/26 (81%) in CAZ-AVI group vs 17/20 (85%) in control groups. Against 53 AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa isolates, CAZ-AVI (73.6% S) showed greater in vitro activity than AMK (69.8% S), TZC (58.5% S), and MEM (37.7% S). Clinical cures in patients with baseline AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa were 12/14 (86%) in CAZ-AVI group vs 9/12 (75%) in control groups. MIC distributions against the same P aeruginosa isolates were CAZ-AVI (MIC50/90, 4/ &amp;gt;64 µg/mL), MVB (MIC50/90, 8/32 µg/mL), and MEM (MIC50/90, 8/32 µg/mL). Table Conclusion CAZ-AVI was the most active agent against AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa with higher proportion of clinical cure than controls. CAZ-AVI was also among the most active agents against AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales, with &amp;gt;96% isolates susceptible. Disclosures Lynn-Yao Lin, MS, AbbVie (Employee) Dmitri Debabov, PhD, AbbVie (Employee) William Chang, BS, AbbVie (Employee) Urania Rappo, MD, MS, PharmD, Allergan (before its acquisition by AbbVie) (Employee)

open forum infectious diseases

1592. Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against <i>Enterobacterales</i> and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> With Overexpression of AmpC β-Lactamase From Phase 3 Clinical Trials

1592. Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa With Overexpression of AmpC β-Lactamase From Phase 3 Clinical Trials