108. Impact of Accelerate Pheno System in the Management of Gram-Negative Rod Bacteremia
Author(s) -
Iaswarya Ganapathiraju,
Amanda Bushman,
Rossana Rosa Espinoza
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.153
Subject(s) - medicine , antimicrobial stewardship , bacteremia , logistic regression , odds ratio , emergency medicine , retrospective cohort study , bloodstream infection , emergency department , exact test , mann–whitney u test , antibiotics , antibiotic resistance , psychiatry , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
Background Early pathogen identification and initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is key in the management of Gram-negative rods (GNR) bloodstream infection (BSI). The Accelerate Pheno System (ACC) has been shown to reduce time to GNR identification compared to traditional culture-based methods. We aimed to determine the impact of ACC on the management of GNR BSI in the setting of a well-established antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). Table 1 Methods ACC was introduced in our institution on February 2019. Due to issues incorporating ACC, of patients with GNR BSI, 74% had ACC done and 26% had reporting through traditional methods. This allowed for the design of a retrospective cohort study (instead of a pre-post analysis) to evaluate the association of interest. We included adult patients admitted to three affiliated hospitals in Des Moines, Iowa with BSI due to Enterobacteriales from February 2019 to February 2020. Exclusion criteria were Emergency Department visit only and death within 48 hours of blood culture collection. Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay, days to therapy optimization and in-hospital mortality. Continuous variables were compared by non-parametric methods and categorical variables were compared by Chi-square and Fisher-exact test. Logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratio for the impact of the intervention on therapy optimization. Results A total of 268 patients were analyzed. The median length of stay among patients who had ACC done was 5.2 days (IQR 3.6–8.7) and in those on who ACC was not done it was 5.5 (IQR 3.8–8.9) (p=0.54). No differences in in-hospital mortality were found (p=0.942). Changes in therapy and missed opportunities for optimization according to whether ACC was done are shown in Table 1. Patients who had ACC done had 99% higher odds of de-escalation within 48 hours of blood culture collection compared to patients who did not have it done (95% CI 1.01–3.92; p=0.044). Conclusion In the context of hospitals with baseline short length of stay and a well-established ASP, performing ACC was associated with higher odds of de-escalation within 48 hours of blood culture collection but did not impact length of stay or mortality among patients hospitalized with GNR BSI. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom