z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
1337. An Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiative for Urinary Tract Infections in Primary Care Pediatrics
Author(s) -
Mary Kathryn Mannix,
Shamim Islam
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1519
Subject(s) - medicine , antimicrobial stewardship , antibiotics , pediatrics , discontinuation , intervention (counseling) , azithromycin , urinary system , tazobactam , fosfomycin , cephalosporin , emergency medicine , imipenem , antibiotic resistance , nursing , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
Background Studies have showed that 30% of antibiotics prescribed in the outpatient setting are unnecessary. Acute UTI constitutes a significant health burden in outpatient pediatrics affecting ~2.8% of children every year. Antibiotics are often started empirically when diagnosing UTI making pediatric UTIs an ideal target for outpatient stewardship. The primary objective was to reduce the use of broad-spectrum empiric antibiotics with a secondary objective to study antibiotic discontinuation in culture negative cases. Methods The electronic medical records of two pediatric practices were screened for patients aged 2 months to 18 years diagnosed with uncomplicated UTI using ICD-10 codes N39, R30 and R35. The definition of a positive urine culture was > 50,000 CFU/ml if catheterized and > 100,000 CFU/ml if clean-catch specimen. A two-year pre-intervention period began in January 2018. An audit and review of urine culture processes were studied at each site with a subsequent educational intervention, a direct, one-hour session focused on the use of cephalexin as first-line empiric therapy based on the local antibiogram. The post-intervention period began at each site after the intervention. A COVID-19 sub-analysis was performed for the post-intervention period. Results During the study, 515 encounters and 113 encounters were included during the pre- and post-intervention periods, respectively. 74.4% (383/515) of pre-intervention encounters had empirically prescribed antibiotics; higher-generation cephalosporins (i.e. cefdinir, cefprozil) most frequently. Antibiotics were empirically prescribed in 75.2% (85/113) of post-intervention encounters with a statistically significant increase in cephalexin use (32/85, 37.6%, p < 0.01) and reduction in higher-generation cephalosporin use (p < 0.01), Figure 1. In the COVID-19 analysis, empiric antibiotic prescribing trended towards baseline as providers were relying largely on telemedicine, Figure 2. Figure 1: Empiric Antibiotic Prescribing Pre- and Post-InterventionF Figure 2: Empiric Antibiotic Prescribing - % Table 1: Pre- and Post-Intervention Conclusion The educational intervention was effective in changing antibiotic prescribing with an increased use of narrow spectrum antibiotics. This change waned without reinforcement and reliance on telemedicine during COVID-19. Antibiotic discontinuation in culture-negative cases remains an important area for improvement. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom