z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
1329. Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: How to hit the Curve
Author(s) -
Michael Vala,
Ryan Chapin,
Nicholas J. Mercuro,
Christopher McCoy
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1511
Subject(s) - medicine , therapeutic drug monitoring , dosing , vancomycin , area under the curve , pharmacokinetics , renal function , trough level , nephrotoxicity , trough concentration , minimum inhibitory concentration , pharmacodynamics , urology , pharmacology , antibiotics , toxicity , tacrolimus , transplantation , biology , bacteria , genetics , staphylococcus aureus , microbiology and biotechnology
Background For the management of serious S. aureus infections, area-under-the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) applied dosing is recommended as the preferred method to goal trough-based monitoring. This pharmacodynamic dosing demonstrates efficacy with optimized exposure and decreased nephrotoxicity. While two levels are ideal for estimating AUC/MIC mathematically, the logistics and costs may outweigh the benefits of this approach. This study will compare AUC/MIC estimates using two single-level pharmacokinetic calculators (C2 and C3) and a Bayesian dosing calculator (C1) versus steady-state troughs. Methods A retrospective cohort study using a data repository to identify patients from 2019 included patients on intravenous vancomycin for greater than 48 hours with a steady state trough. Patients on dialysis or with unstable renal function were excluded. Vancomycin AUC/MIC and peak levels were estimated using C1, C2, and C3. The objective was to assess correlation of trough levels of 10-20mcg/ml to an AUC/MIC of 400-600 mg∙h/L. Secondary outcomes included examining the difference in R-squared values of the three calculators, and the percentage of patients with dose adjustments. Results 55 patients met inclusion criteria. Of 55 troughs, 78% were 10-20mcg/ml and 5% were >20mcg/ml. On average, the three calculators found 85% of all initial troughs and 93% of therapeutic troughs correlated to an AUC >400. However, less than half of therapeutic troughs corresponded to an AUC of 400-600 mg∙h/L. Nearly 70% of patients had one or more dose adjustments often for unclear reasons as the AUC/MIC target of 400-600 mg∙h/L was met in 29-63% of initial adjustments. The three different calculators showed noticeable variability in calculating AUC/MIC. Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Conclusion A weak relationship between AUC/MIC and steady state troughs was found. Excess vancomycin exposure was demonstrated in 39% of therapeutic troughs. Over 25% of dose adjustments were deemed unnecessary. Utilizing AUC/MIC estimates for vancomycin may limit excess exposure while reducing the overall number of drug levels. Selecting a single-level calculator is problematic with the high degree of variation between calculators. Figure 4 Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom