z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
99. Comparison of Procalcitonin Testing to a Targeted Audit-and Feedback Strategy on Prescribed Durations of Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Author(s) -
Lauren T. Clark,
Lisa E. Dumkow,
Paige M. Buss,
Thomas S. Beuschel,
Andrew Jameson
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.144
Subject(s) - medicine , procalcitonin , community acquired pneumonia , pneumonia , antibiotic therapy , audit , reimbursement , psychological intervention , antimicrobial stewardship , emergency medicine , antibiotics , sepsis , health care , management , psychiatry , economic growth , microbiology and biotechnology , economics , biology , antibiotic resistance
Background The procalcitonin (PCT) assay is FDA-approved to help guide antimicrobial treatment of respiratory tract infections, however, conflicting data exist regarding its impact on shortening durations of therapy. The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of PCT to a targeted audit-and-feedback (TAF) strategy on prescribed antibiotic durations of therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at two community teaching hospitals, one implementing PCT with routine audit-and-feedback and one implementing a TAF strategy recommending 5 days of therapy for uncomplicated CAP. The primary objective of this study was to compare the impact of PCT implementation to TAF implementation on durations of therapy prescribed for suspected CAP. Secondary objectives included comparing length of stay, 30-day readmission, mortality, and rates of Clostridioides difficile. Adult inpatients with an antibiotic ordered with an indication of pneumonia were eligible for inclusion. Those who were critically ill, immunocompromised, had concurrent infections, were made comfort care, discharged or expired within 48 hours were excluded. Results 311 patients were included (Pre-TAF n=80, Pre-PCT n=80, Post-TAF n=80, Post-PCT n=71). Average duration of therapy prescribed for CAP at baseline was similar between groups, Pre-TAF 7.0 days vs. Pre-PCT 7.8 days (p=0.1). After implementation of the respective interventions, there remained no difference in the average duration of therapy between groups, Post-TAF 5.5 days vs. Post-PCT 5.4 days (p=0.8). Both PCT and TAF strategies demonstrated significant improvement in prescribed durations for CAP between their respective Pre- and Post-intervention groups (p< 0.001 and p=0.002, respectively). The PCT protocol was followed 41% of the time in the Post-PCT group. There were no differences in readmission, mortality, or C. difficile between groups. Conclusion PCT and TAF were equally effective antimicrobial stewardship strategies in reducing total days of antibiotic therapy prescribed for CAP with no differences observed in patient outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom