1106. The incidence and risk factors associated with varicella zoster virus infection in kidney transplant recipients after 1-month acyclovir prophylaxis in a CMV preemptive therapy era
Author(s) -
Hae-In Kim,
Joo Hee Jung,
Jiwon Jung,
Min Jae Kim,
Hyosang Kim,
Sung Shin,
Yong Chong,
YoungHoon Kim,
SangOh Lee,
SangHo Choi,
Yang Soo Kim,
Jun Hee Woo,
Su-Kil Park,
Duck Jong Han,
SungHan Kim
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1292
Subject(s) - medicine , ganciclovir , interquartile range , postherpetic neuralgia , varicella zoster virus , incidence (geometry) , pediatrics , immunology , virus , human cytomegalovirus , anesthesia , physics , optics , neuropathic pain
Background Varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection is a well-known opportunistic infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Since the various strategies of the use of anti-herpetic drugs including ganciclovir or acyclovir have evolved, the epidemiology of VZV infection is changing. However, there are limited data on the recent incidence and risk factors of post-transplant VZV infection in popular preemptive ganciclovir era for CMV infection. We evaluated the incidence, risk factors and clinical characteristic of patients with development of post-transplant VZV infection in kidney transplant (KT) recipients after 1-month acyclovir prophylaxis in the hospital that adopted preemptive ganciclovir therapy for CMV infection. Methods All adult patients with seropositive CMV antibody admitted to a KT unit from January 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed in a tertiary-care hospital in South Korea. Our hospital adopted preemptive ganciclovir therapy for CMV infection in all CMV seropositive KT recipients. We administered acyclovir prophylaxis for 1-month to CMV seropositive KT recipients. The primary endpoint was VZV infection development after KT. Results A total of 1295 KT recipients was followed up for 4295.8 person-years. The median follow-up period was 46.6 months (interquartile range (IQR) 34.3-59.5). Of the 1295 recipients, 100 (7.7%, 2.33 per 100 person-years, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.89-2.83) patients developed VZV infection after KT. The median time for VZV infection development was 9.5 months (IQR 4.7-22.1). All patients had VZV-associated skin lesion, 9 postherpetic neuralgia, 2 visceral involvement and 3 disseminated infection. Of 100 patients, 16 patients need hospitalization due to VZV infection. In multivariate analysis, deceased donor KT (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.6; 95% CI 1.0-2.39, p = 0.05), mycophenolate maintenance immunosuppressive therapy (HR 0.3; 95% CI 0.14-0.75, p = 0.01) and rejection episode (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.14-0.71, p = 0.01) were independently associated with VZV infection development after KT. Conclusion About one tenth of CMV seropositive KT recipients developed zoster after 1-month ACV prophylaxis during CMV preemptive strategy, especially in those who received deceased donor KT, mycophenolate therapy, and rejection episodes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom