z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
1062. HCV GET-UP: A Group Evaluation and Treatment Uptake Intervention Improves HCV Linkage to Care for PWID
Author(s) -
Brianna L. Norton,
Nataly Rios Gutierrez,
Chinazo O. Cunningham,
Alain H. Litwin
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1248
Subject(s) - medicine , hepatitis c , family medicine , intervention (counseling) , hepatitis c virus , health care , psychiatry , immunology , virus , economics , economic growth
Background Though PWID represent the overwhelming majority of those living with HCV in the United States, most have not been treated. PWID often have reduced access to specialty care, as well as limited HCV knowledge, low perceived vulnerability to poor HCV-related health outcomes, poor self-efficacy, high levels of perceived stigma, and mistrust of healthcare providers. We therefore evaluated an primary care based HCV Group Evaluation and Treatment UPtake (HCV GET-UP) intervention to improve HCV medical evaluation and treatment uptake for HCV+ PWIDs. Figure 1 Methods We enrolled 84 HCV+ PWID and randomize them 1:1 to a 4-week group evaluation intervention followed by individual treatment (intervention) versus onsite treatment alone (control). The group consisted of 4 weekly 1-hour sessions focused on HCV education, peer motivation, and health behavior change skills, along with an HCV medical evaluation. Both arms received HCV treatment according to national guidelines. Baseline questionnaires were performed via Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview (ACASI) technology. Clinical Data was extracted from the medical chart. Our primary outcomes were HCV linkage to care (HCV evaluation) and treatment uptake. Bivariate analyses were performed to evaluate HCV treatment outcomes between arms using chi square tests. Results Of the 76 participants that have currently completed the study (84 enrolled) 35% identified their race as black, 61% identified their ethnicity as Hispanic, 79% were male, and 25% of the participants were homeless. 87% had genotype 1, 28% were HIV+, and 20% had cirrhosis. Baseline urine tocixicologies were positive for cocaine in 38% of participants and 40% for heroin. Of those randomized to the group treatment arm vs individual arm 87% vs 62% were linked to care (p=0.012), 51% vs. 41% initiated treatment (p=.35), 41% vs. 35% completed treatment (p=0.6), and 33% vs. 27% (p=0.6) Conclusion HCV GET-UP, a primary-care based group evaluation and treatment uptake intervention significantly improved linkage to care for HCV+ PWID. Though this is encouraging, we must integrate other interventions to aid PWID as they move through the more proximal steps of the HCV cascade, for HCV cure still remains elusive for the majority of PWID enrolled. Disclosures Chinazo O. Cunningham, MD, MPH, General Electric Health (Other Financial or Material Support, My husband is currently employed by General Electric Health and receives stock and stock options.)Quest Diagnostics (Other Financial or Material Support, My husband was previously employed by Quest Diagnostics and received stocks and stock options.) Alain H. Litwin, MD, MPH, MS, Gilead (Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck (Advisor or Review Panel member)

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom