z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Real-world Time to Positivity of 2 Widely Used Commercial Blood Culture Systems in Patients With Severe Manifestations of Sepsis: An Analysis of the FABLED Study
Author(s) -
Guillaume ButlerLaporte,
Cédric P. Yansouni,
Katryn Paquette,
Alexander Lawandi,
Sarah Stabler,
Murtaza Akhter,
Adam C Davidson,
Marko Gavric,
Rehman Jinah,
Zahid A. Saeed,
Koray Demir,
Sassan Sangsari,
Kelly Huang,
Amirali Mahpour,
Chris Shamatutu,
Chelsea Caya,
Jean-Marc Troquet,
Gregory Clark,
Titus Wong,
Todd C. Lee,
Robert Stenstrom,
David Sweet,
Matthew P. Cheng
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofaa371
Subject(s) - medicine , blood culture , interquartile range , sepsis , prospective cohort study , bacteremia , cohort , cohort study , population , surgery , antibiotics , environmental health , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
Background Of all microbiological tests performed, blood cultures have the most impact on patient care. Timely results are essential, especially in the management of sepsis. While there are multiple available blood culture systems on the market, they have never been compared in a prospective study in a critically ill population. Methods We performed an analysis of the FABLED study cohort to compare culture results and time to positivity (TTP) of 2 widely used blood culture systems: BacT/Alert and BACTEC. In this multisite prospective study, patients with severe manifestations of sepsis had cultures drawn before antibiotics using systematic enrollment criteria and blood drawing methodology allowing for minimization of pre-analytical biases. Results We enrolled 315 patients; 144 had blood cultures (47 positive) with BacT/Alert and 171 with BACTEC (53 positive). Patients whose blood cultures were processed using the BacT/Alert system were younger (median, 64 vs 70 years; P = .003), had a higher proportion of HIV (9.03% vs 1.75%; P = .008) and a lower qSOFA (P = .003). There were no statistically significant differences in the most commonly identified bacterial species. TTP was shorter for BACTEC (median [interquartile range {IQR}], 12.5 [10–14] hours) compared with BacT/Alert (median [IQR], 17 [14–21] hours; P < .0001). Conclusions In this large prospective multi-centre study comparing the two blood culture systems among patients with severe manifestations of sepsis, and using a rigorous pre-analytical methodology, the BACTEC system yielded positive culture results 4.5 hours earlier than BacT/Alert. These results apply to commonly isolated bacteria. However, our study design did not allow direct comparison of TTP for unusual pathogens nor of clinical sensitivity between systems. More research is needed to determine the clinical implications of this finding.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom