z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Automatic ID Consultation for Inpatients With COVID-19: Point, Counterpoint, and a Single-Center Experience
Author(s) -
Cynthia T. Nguyen,
Gregory Olson,
Mai T. Pho,
Alison Lew,
David Pitrak,
Jina Saltzman,
Aniruddha Hazra,
Kenneth Pursell,
Natasha N. Pettit
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofaa318
Subject(s) - covid-19 , medicine , pandemic , center (category theory) , medical emergency , counterpoint , family medicine , pathology , psychology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , outbreak , pedagogy , chemistry , disease , crystallography
There are many unknowns with regard to COVID-19 clinical management, including the role of Infectious Diseases Consultation (IDC). As hospitalizations for COVID-19 continue, hospitals are assessing how to optimally and efficiently manage COVID-19 inpatients. Typically, primary teams must determine when IDC is appropriate, and ID clinicians provide consultation upon request of the primary team. IDC has been shown to be beneficial for many conditions; however, the impact of IDC for COVID-19 is unknown. Herein, we discuss the potential benefits and pitfalls of automatic IDC for COVID-19 inpatients. Important considerations include the quality of care provided, allocation and optimization of resources, and clinician satisfaction. Finally, we describe how automatic IDC changed throughout the COVID-19 pandemic at a single academic medical center.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom