z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Austerity versus stimulus: the polarizing effect of fiscal policy
Author(s) -
Richard McManus
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
oxford economic papers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.68
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1464-3812
pISSN - 0030-7653
DOI - 10.1093/oep/gpv023
Subject(s) - economics , austerity , fiscal policy , stimulus (psychology) , dynamic stochastic general equilibrium , welfare , normative , monetary economics , new keynesian economics , aggregate demand , macroeconomics , monetary policy , keynesian economics , politics , psychotherapist , psychology , philosophy , epistemology , political science , law , market economy
Through constructing a new Keynesian DSGE model with heterogeneous agents, this article investigates both the aggregate and distributional consequences of fiscal policy. Polarized preferences over the conduct of fiscal policy emerge between those agents who participate in credit markets and those who do not. Exogenous shocks impact the two types of agent differently, and as a result, fiscal policy responses to these shocks produce minimal aggregate welfare effects as the gains of one agent are matched by the losses of another. There is therefore a normative justification for counter-cyclical fiscal policy, but on redistributive rather than stabilization grounds.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom