z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
How should commodities be taxed? A counter-argument to the recommendation in the Mirrlees Review
Author(s) -
Spencer Bastani,
Sören Blomquist,
Jukka Pirttilä
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
oxford economic papers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.68
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1464-3812
pISSN - 0030-7653
DOI - 10.1093/oep/gpu031
Subject(s) - commodity , economics , argument (complex analysis) , consumption (sociology) , microeconomics , optimal tax , government (linguistics) , public economics , finance , social science , biochemistry , chemistry , linguistics , philosophy , sociology
The Mirrlees Review recommends that commodity taxation should in general be uniform, but with some goods consumed in conjunction with labour supply (such as child care) left untaxed. This article examines the validity of this claim in an optimal income tax framework. Contrary to the recommendation of the review, our theoretical results imply that even if all goods other than the good needed for working are separable from leisure, the optimal tax on these goods should not be uniform. Instead, commodity taxes should discourage consumption of goods with large expenditure elasticities. Our results imply that the optimal commodity tax system is dependent on the expenditure side of the government. For instance, if the government fully subsidizes the cost of the good needed for working, then commodity taxation is uniform under the standard separability assumption. Calibration exercises suggest that these results can be quantitatively important

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom