RADI-06. SINGLE- VERSUS MULTI-FRACTION STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAINSTEM METASTASES
Author(s) -
Corbin D. Jacobs,
Kehali Woldemichael,
Hannah Williamson,
З. С. Абишева,
Elizabeth Howell,
Jihad Abdelgadir,
Cosette Dechant,
Scott Floyd,
Peter E. Fecci,
John P. Kirkpatrick,
Justus Adamson,
Jordan A. Torok
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
neuro-oncology advances
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2632-2498
DOI - 10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.099
Subject(s) - radiosurgery , medicine , nuclear medicine , brainstem , retrospective cohort study , cohort , dose fractionation , radiology , radiation therapy
BACKGROUND: For intracranial metastases with planning target volume (PTV) overlap of the brainstem (BSmet), the radiosurgical dose-fractionation that optimizes the therapeutic window is unknown. MATERIALS/METHODS: A retrospective review of brain metastases (BM) with/without BSmets treated with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypofractionated (2–5 fractions) radiosurgery (HF-SRS) between 2012–2016 was performed. Brainstem biologically effective doses (BED) and single-fraction equivalents of brainstem V10/V12 were calculated using α/β=3. Characteristics were compared between patients with/without BSmet and between SRS/HF-SRS cohorts using Wilcoxon rank sum, chi-square, or Fisher’s exact tests. Radiographic progression (RP) was assessed in patients with post-treatment contrasted MRI and defined as BSmet enlargement regardless of etiology (progression, radionecrosis, indeterminate). Kaplan-Meier estimates were compared between cohorts using log-rank test. RESULTS: 634 SRS/HF-SRS courses were identified, of which 59 (9.3%) treated ≥1 BSmet in 55 patients. BSmets occurred more commonly in patients with >4 BM (31% vs 10%, p< 0.001) and intracranial recurrence (39% vs 20%, p=0.003). BSmets were treated in 1 (22/59; 37%), 2 (1/59; 2%), or 5 (36/59; 61%) fractions. Age, KPS, and primary tumor site were balanced between SRS/HF-SRS cohorts. The HF-SRS cohort had significantly larger BSmet PTV (median 1.39cc vs 0.39cc, p=0.021), marginal dose (median 25Gy vs 15Gy, p< 0.001), brainstem V10 (median 1.60cc vs 0.47cc, p< 0.001), brainstem V12 (median 0.78cc vs 0.06cc, p< 0.001), and mean brainstem BED (median 9.27Gy3 vs 6.55Gy3, p=0.019). The SRS cohort was more likely to have prior whole brain radiotherapy (50% vs 14%, p=0.005) and restart steroids post-treatment (78% vs 41%, p=0.019). RP occurred in 6/17 vs 2/25 patients in the SRS vs HF-SRS cohorts, respectively (p=0.045). HF-SRS trended to higher freedom from RP (93% vs 74% @12mo; p=0.072). There was no overall survival difference (p=0.36). CONCLUSIONS: HF-SRS was associated with decreased RP and decreased likelihood of restarting steroids despite treating larger BSmets.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom